As usual al Jazeera is at the cutting edge. Here is the Al Jazeera Twitter Strategy at the 140 character conference in New York – day 1 June 16, 2009:
[blip.tv ?posts_id=2279580&dest=-1]
Category: events/conferences
State of Play – New York
I am attending State of Play conference in New York. The opening speech was interesting – by the creator of Metaplace. Here are some highlights of what he said:
Raph Koster: A New Kind of World
Where is virtual world’s relevance? Virtual worlds are web 1.0 not even 2.0 not to mention 3.D. Why does the web work today? Because it is open: html, online Mozilla, apache, CGI, CSS, DNS, Google. The biggest underlining assumption is that everyone can do what they want. Virtual Worlds don’t work this way. It is a network and does not run on a single centralized server. Can they become relevant and can they break out of the plateau? When will VWs become more like the web? Metaplace tries to do that – it leaves open template content, etc. Problem is, we don’t know if anybody cares. What is the killer app for VW? It is wasting time and having fun – not education nor distance collaboration.
Do users care that they are beyond entertainment? What does it mean to build that? How do we evolve our thinking? If we actually give users the ability to work it as the web [not centrally managed, not on a single server etc].. how do we think about commerce? Eulas? Privacy?
Metaplace TOS: gives rights of creators and rights of users unless overridden, responsibilities of creators and users. It is rights of avatars. Freedom of expression, ownership, including earning money and running their own world, privacy, develop their own TOS. The declaration of the rights of avatars is now in place. They told users not to break the law. This was of course challenging.
Could we have this any other way? What areas are public? What things are private? What about people hopping across worlds? Which TOS do they belong to?
Modeling after the web: hotlinking or deep linking for example could it be the same when avatars are actually walking around through links?
Future: what will VWs be?
- Ambient: are you in your browser frame?
- Pervasive: what’s the TOS for a widget?
- Preamble: what’s the privacy policy of a multidirectional stream?
- Overlays: what’s a world in the first place?
- Relevant? The new kind of world isn’t this; it’s the new hybrid.
Looking for the new model. Old worlds will not go away but there will be a change. If they are to be relevant, how much can they emulate the web and take down countries [as did Twitter].
digital inclusion and cyber crime – helping pedophiles form networks
A conference in Rio de Janeiro will start Monday to discuss cyber crime including pedophilia and will be discussing the digital divide/digital inclusion. The conference is entitled the UN Internet Governance Forum, a product of the World Summit that took place in Tunisia in 2005. Among its topics is, of course, governance issues on the internet. It is expected that
2,000 participants from 100 countries will examine ways to tackle pedophilia and cybercrime. [The conference] will also discuss the implications of more than 80 percent of the world’s population not having access to the worldwide network, mainly those in developing countries.
Apparently ‘millions of pedophiles’ have been enabled by the openness of the Internet and have been able to connect and form networks:
The US Congress also gave information recently that hinted at the size of the problem. According to an agent in the Justice Department’s special crimes investigation bureau, the Internet has allowed “maybe millions” of pedophiles in the world to form a network online. [link]
For more information on the Forum, visit their official website.