Category: ncmr11

At National conference for media reform – Boston April 8th
Panel: Wikileaks, Journalism and Modern-Day Muckraking

Glenn Greenwald: talking about how some journalists were actually livid and furious over release of cables. A journalist was outraged that the gov did not do a better job of ‘concealing’ this info from him.  I did lots of shows on Wikileaks and in every single show the journalist and the opposing person were saying the same thing. The idea that a journalist thought exactly as the powers that be is surprising to me. Wikileaks discloses the deceitful things that happen in our names and I am surprised that journalists were angry about the disclosure and not about what the powers that be are doing. Read More …

At National Conference for Media Reform – Boston 2011
Panel: Wikileaks, Journalism and Modern-Day Muckraking

Emily Bell: how do we equip future generations of journalists. The role of professional journalists has been replaced by people and algorithms but journalists are not obsolete. Wikileaks caught journalists by surprise: to my students I asked what would you do if this fell on your desk? Answer should be we should just publish it. We need to be tech-literate and we don’t have free press. The ‘free press’ is owned by Twitter, FB and google and they are also debated. Ppl have poor understanding of how technology can be used so it means that we have to shift how journalism is done. We have to enable connection of expertise and how to maintain professionalism on a network that you do not necessarily own or have control over.  We need to report on what the impact of such stories are and we have not yet seen how all this plays out in terms of free press. We therefore need to encourage journalists to close the feedback loop with follow-up reporting on how their stories affect change.

At national conference on media reform, Boston – April 8th

Micah Sifry @Mlsif  talking. Thanks to resilience of 1000s of ppl – it is a transnational journalism [when wikileaks was taken down many put it up and mirrored it]. Ppl who were audiences are now actors, and ppl of authority now know we are watching them. They have to know that it is a question of trust by being transparent and truthful not by your degree. Wikileaks itself is broken. Assange is a flawed figure – I don’t like the way he runs the org. Hardly an eg of transparency in action: what is it releasing and why? How they get info and why the portal is now not secure? NYT is clearly broken: it has an entire set of cables. How they handled the database inside the building was not good. They did keyword searches. How did they not find kleptocracy? Bec now we know Libya was like that. This is an incredibly valuable archive sitting there but maybe they should open it up in some fashion for us. Two last points: clearly Obama’s commitment to transparency is broken. Wikileaks made it clear we had two govs in US: one that elects and one that makes decisions. We have to dismantle that if we are ever going to live in a truly open society. Wikileaks showed us how valuable the internet is, it can be a source for democracy but it is incredibly fragile. When Sen. Lieberman made Amazon go offline, it showed us how we are similar to McCarthyism. This goes beyond net neutrality – what’s at stake is ability to access info that we need and we have to make sure we continue to do that.

At national conference on media reform – Boston April 8th

Panel: Wikileaks, Journalism and Modern-Day Muckraking
Moderator Amy Goodman of Democracy Now.

Greg Mitchell @GregMitch: [author of Bradley Manning book http://j.mp/i5Anga] Collatoral murder video came out a year ago. There was more before cablegate.

 

Yesterday Washington post talks abt cables released a year ago abt Yemen’s Saleh. Media has to decide what to cover and what to ignore. Wikileaks has threatened that from beginning that it will circumvent gatekeepers of media bec media self-censors. Wikileaks itself in the collateral murder video, since then they formed partnerships with newspapers for different releases. They began working with mainstream media and led to good coverage. Al Jazeera [ @AJEnglish ] #Transparency Unit mentioned by @GregMitch: http://j.mp/gn86aY NYT had to admit finally that they showed all cables to CIA and so they got the raw documents but did discretional censorship and exerted their gatekeeper function. By December they stopped coverage and gone to other issues. Times and Guardian conflict with Assange and perhaps that’s why he moved on to Washington post. Several whistleblowing sites came up but now the message re manning is ‘see what happens if you leak anything’.