I am attending State of Play conference in New York. The opening speech was interesting – by the creator of Metaplace. Here are some highlights of what he said:<\/p>\n
Raph Koster: A New Kind of World<\/strong><\/p>\n Where is virtual world\u2019s relevance? Virtual worlds are web 1.0 not even 2.0 not to mention 3.D. Why does the web work today? Because it is open: html, online Mozilla, apache, CGI, CSS, DNS, Google. The biggest underlining assumption is that everyone can do what they want. Virtual Worlds don\u2019t work this way. It is\u00a0 a network and does not run on a single centralized server. Can they become relevant and can they break out of the plateau? When will VWs become more like the web? Metaplace tries to do that \u2013 it leaves open template content, etc. Problem is, we don\u2019t know if anybody cares. What is the killer app for VW? It is wasting time and having fun \u2013 not education nor distance collaboration.<\/p>\n Do users care that they are beyond entertainment? What does it mean to build that? How do we evolve our thinking? If we actually give users the ability to work it as the web [not centrally managed, not on a single server etc].. how do we think about commerce? Eulas? Privacy?<\/p>\n Metaplace TOS: gives rights of creators and rights of users unless overridden, responsibilities of creators and users. It is rights of avatars. Freedom of expression, ownership, including earning money and running their own world, privacy, develop their own TOS. The declaration of the rights of avatars is now in place. They told users not to break the law. This was of course challenging.<\/p>\n Could we have this any other way? What areas are public? What things are private? What about people hopping across worlds? Which TOS do they belong to?<\/p>\n Modeling after the web: hotlinking or deep linking for example could it be the same when avatars are actually walking around through links?<\/p>\n Future: what will VWs be?<\/p>\n